Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.
9.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.
8.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.
4.0 pts
Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited or no scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited or no scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Definition/Explanation of Selected Concept
25.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources.
22.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources.
20.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited support from scholarly sources.
10.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support.
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Literature Review
35.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
31.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
28.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
13.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in a disorganized fashion.
35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Defining Attributes
25.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes Support from scholarly sources provided.
22.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Support from scholarly sources provided.
20.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Limited support from scholarly sources provided.
10.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: One or two attributes of the selected nursing concepts were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: No attributes of the selected nursing concept were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Antecedent & Consequence
25.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.
22.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.
20.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided.
10.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly literature was provided.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Empirical Referents
20.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.
18.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.
16.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided.
8.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Construct Cases
30.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.
26.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.
24.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.
11.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Theoretical Applications of the Concept
30.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
26.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required
24.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
11.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion
10.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.
9.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.
8.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.
4.0 pts
Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Paper Specifications
20.0 pts
This section included all of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 page. Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.
18.0 pts
This section included three of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.
16.0 pts
This section included only two of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.
8.0 pts
This section included only one of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.
0.0 pts
This section included none of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format (6th edition)
10.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 0 to 1 APA error was present
9.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 2 – 3 APA errors were present
8.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 4 – 5 APA were are present
4.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 6 – 7 APA were are present
0.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 8 or greater APA errors were present
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Citations
5.0 pts
There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was obtained from faculty.
4.0 pts
There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was NOT obtained from faculty.
3.0 pts
There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge
2.0 pts
There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge
0.0 pts
There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Quality
5.0 pts
1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
4.0 pts
3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
3.0 pts
5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
2.0 pts
7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
0.0 pts
9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Late Deductions
0.0 pts
0 pts lost – submission met deadline
0.0 pts
student does not meet the deadline for submission 10% per day up to 30% total (3-days)
0.0 pts
