The highlighted areas are the areas that need to be revised. This was the report I received. Please make the revisions as soon as possible and send me a revised version of the paper. Look back at the items I have already sent you and make sure you are Competent in every aspect of the paper. This is the only way I am able to pass. Thank you again. Also, this paper has a lot of Articulation errors. I am also sending back the paper that you sent me with highlighted areas that are grammatically incorrect and need to be revised as well. Make sure you have complete sentences and that the submission is articulated well.
General comments:
Professional Communication (Articulation) – This well-crafted submission is appropriately organized; useful headings are readily available. Sentence fluency and parts of speech errors disrupt the readability of the work.
Content -A presentation on Project in Organizational Leadership and Interprofessional Team Development is presented. The essay clearly recognizes the field that requires immediate attention is ensuring that the families and patients have access to a web portal that ensures a fast response. An excellent overview of ensuring a web portal system that is easily accessible, reliable and simple is presented in great detail. The discussion precisely addresses the financial implications of the strategy include an increase in the service fee of the patients. A detailed description of a specific healthcare setting, including the population served, facility type, and the community, is not evident in the discussion. The identification of the strengths and/or weaknesses of a specific healthcare organization for each of the 11 domains is not evident in the analysis. The description of a specific change theory is not evident in the submission. How the methods will be used to specifically evaluate the effectiveness of the strategy in increasing patient-centered care is not evident in the paper. The importance of cultural diversity within a team, including representation and how cultural diversity within a team specifically supports patient-centered, culturally competent care is unclear in the description. How the transformational leadership style is relevant to implementing the identified strategy is unclear in the essay. The identification of the steps to collaboratively implement the strategy, including team members and their individual responsibilities, is not evident in the submission. Methods of how the team will specifically communicate the strategy and intended outcomes to the healthcare organization is not evident in the discussion. The recognition of a specific tool that will help the team develop self-assessment skills is not evident in the paper.
Detailed Results
Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)
Approaching Competency- The candidate provides weak articulation of response.
Comments on this criterion: Thoughtful information is structured in a logical and cohesive manner. Sentence fluency and parts of speech concerns, mostly relating to missing and extraneous words, incorrect noun and verb forms, missing articles, disagreement, and unclear phrasing, affect the overall clarity of the response.
A. Business Practices
Competent- The analysis includes how business practices, regulatory requirements, and reimbursement impact patient centered care within a healthcare organization.
Comments on this criterion: The paper clearly states that as hospital and health system reimbursements become more closely tied to clinical outcomes as well as patient satisfaction, patient experience surveys are becoming an increasingly valuable tool for healthcare organizations to guide efforts for improving the patient experience.
B. Self-Assessment Tool
Competent- The PFCC is complete.
B1. Setting Description
Not Evident- The description of the healthcare setting is not provided or is fundamentally unacceptable.
Comments on this criterion: The description states that the healthcare setting of the organization is shown in the domains. A detailed description of a specific healthcare setting, including the population served, facility type, and the community, is not evident in the discussion.
B2. Strengths and Weaknesses
Not Evident- The description of the strengths and/or weaknesses for each domain is not provided or is fundamentally unacceptable.
Comments on this criterion: The analysis states that the management incorporates the patients in setting of the organizational mission, values and vision. The identification of the strengths and/or weaknesses of a specific healthcare organization for each of the 11 domains is not evident in the analysis.
C. Area of Improvement
Competent- An area of improvement is identified from the weaknesses identified in part B2. The selection is presented clearly and is logical.
Comments on this criterion: The essay clearly recognizes the field that requires immediate attention is ensuring that the families and patients have access to a web portal that ensures a fast response.
C1. Improvement Strategy
Competent- The strategy includes how patient-centeredness could be increased, the strategy is relevant to the PFCC tool, and the strategy focuses on improving the identified weakness.
C1a. System or Change Theory
Not Evident- The description of how the candidate would apply a strategy using system or change theory is not provided or is fundamentally unacceptable.
Comments on this criterion: The submission offers the change theory will effectively measure the effectiveness of the strategy. The description of a specific change theory is not evident in the submission.
C2. Financial Implications
Competent- The discussion precisely addresses the financial implications that the strategy may have on the organization
Comments on this criterion: The discussion precisely addresses the financial implications of the strategy include an increase in the service fee of the patients.
C3. Methods
Not Evident- The discussion of the methods used to monitor the effectiveness of the strategy is not provided or is fundamentally unacceptable.
Comments on this criterion: The paper states that the establishment of measures will be done through quantitative evaluation to examine the change. How the methods will be used to specifically evaluate the effectiveness of the strategy in increasing patient-centered care is not evident in the paper.
D. Multidisciplinary Team
Competent- The identification of the multidisciplinary team members and their specific roles on the team in assisting in implementing the strategy is relevant and logical.
Comments on this criterion: The analysis clearly identifies the Financial Manager as a team member who will facilitate the funds required to implement the changes.
D1. Team Diversity
Approaching Competency- The discussion of the importance of cultural diversity within the team is missing information about representation or about how cultural diversity within the team supports patient-centered, culturally competent care.
Comments on this criterion: The description states that the cultural diversity will ensure an option of various languages in the system to ensure culture competence care of the system. The importance of cultural diversity within a team, including representation and how cultural diversity within a team specifically supports patient-centered, culturally competent care is unclear in the description.
D2. Leadership Theories
Approaching Competency- The discussion of the leadership style utilized in developing the team is missing information about the chosen leadership theory or is missing information about how the leadership style is relevant to implementing the identified strategy.
Comments on this criterion: The essay states that the transformational leadership style will be applied to develop the team. How the transformational leadership style is relevant to implementing the identified strategy is unclear in the essay.
D3. Implementation of Strategy
Not Evident- The discussion of how the team collaboratively implements the strategy is not provided or is fundamentally unacceptable.
Comments on this criterion: The submission states that the essence of teamwork is to progressively realize the strategy. The identification of the steps to collaboratively implement the strategy, including team members and their individual responsibilities, is not evident in the submission.
D4. Communication to Organization
Not Evident- The description of how the team will communicate the strategy and outcomes is not provided or is fundamentally unacceptable.
Comments on this criterion: The discussion states that the implementing and spreading of the changes into healthcare organizations will take place to accelerate the accountability and liability of the healthcare organizations and accommodation of patients with chronic ailments. Methods of how the team will specifically communicate the strategy and intended outcomes to the healthcare organization is not evident in the discussion.
Not Evident- The description of the self-assessment tool for the team is not provided or is fundamentally unacceptable.
Comments on this criterion: The paper offers the team’s personal skills will be evaluated through an interview. The recognition of a specific tool that will help the team develop self-assessment skills is not evident in the paper.
E. Sources
Competent- The submission includes in-text citations and references and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style.
